Skip to main content
· 12/7/1989

In Re RLR Celestial Homes, Inc.

Citations

  • 108 B.R. 36
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2088
  • 1989 WL 147790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting Murtishi and noting “to rule otherwise would contravene the express authorization for curing defaults as expressed in 11 U.S.C. § 365(b)(1)”
  • rejecting Murtishi and noting “to rule otherwise would contravene the express authorization for curing defaults as expressed in 11 U.S.C. § 365(b)(1)”
  • rejecting Murtishi and noting “to rule otherwise would contravene the express authorization for curing defaults as expressed in 11 U.S.C. § 365(b)(1)”
  • delivery of legal title by seller to purchaser of real estate is mere formality and does not form the basis for determining that a contract was executory
  • “[A] 5 contract is not deemed terminated and no longer executory simply because the debtor has defaulted or breached the contract before the commencement of a bankruptcy case.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard Schwartzberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.