In Re Rix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court did not abuse its discretion by permitting a father to vacation with his child in India, a non-Hague Convention country, when the mother's evidence gave no indication the father intended to flee with the child and not return
• affirming order allowing child to travel to India with his father over mother's objection that India is not a signatory to the Hague Convention where the trial court noted that it had heard \no evidence that father will not return with the child\
• affirming order allowing child to travel to India with his father over mother's objection that India is not a signatory to the Hague Convention where the trial court noted that it had heard \no evidence that father will not return with the child\
• “We will not overturn a trial court’s determination regarding an award of visitation except where there has been an unsustainable exercise of discretion.”
• “While the trial court did not expressly articulate the standard it employed in making its rulings, we assume that the trial court applied the proper standard.”
• trial court did not abuse discretion in permitting father to vacation with child in India, a non-Hague Convention country, in part, when mother’s evidence gave no indication father intended to flee with child and not return

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).