In Re River Sub, LTD D/B/A Subway v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating a conviction where three thumbprints on movable objects at the crime scene were the sole evidence incriminating the defendant
• reiterating the \well established\ rule that \[t]o warrant conviction the trier of fact must be able to reasonably infer from the circumstances that the fingerprints were impressed at the time the crime was committed\
• reiterating the \well established\ rule that \[t]o war- rant conviction the trier of fact must be able to reasonably infer from 10 the circumstances that the fingerprints were impressed at the time the crime was committed\
• “[t]o warrant conviction the trier of fact must be able to reasonably infer from the circumstances that the fingerprints were impressed at the time the crime was committed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).