Skip to main content
· 3/3/1930

In re Ringstad

Citations

  • 41 F.2d 753
  • 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying that principle to conclude that, “[b]ecause petitioner could have subpoenaed [the police officer] but failed to do so, economy favors relying on the report”
  • declining to give significant weight to the first factor because, although the agency could have subpoenaed the hearsay declarant, “petitioner also could have subpoenaed [him]”
  • petitioner could have subpoenaed witness, but failed to do so
  • declining to give significant weight to first factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schoonmaker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.