In Re Richard M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the juvenile court must exercise its jurisdiction in accordance with due process standards
• “A court cannot order a juvenile into detention without a petition to revoke probation or without a hearing because to do so would violate the juvenile’s right to due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Miguel R.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-02-25· cited 16×
• In re Thomas D.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-20· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Watkins
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-05-05· cited 19×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-01-04· cited 14×
• State v. Robinson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-10· cited 11×
• In Re Marie G.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-08-26· cited 6×
• Matter of Maricopa Cty. Act. No. Jv-508488
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-04-18· cited 6×