In Re: Richard H. Pleasants, Iv, Debtor. Richard H. Pleasants, IV v. E. G. Kendrick, Jr. Randy P. Kendrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the language of Cohen is “broad enough to encompass a situation in which no portion of a creditor’s claims was literally transferred to the fraudu- lent debtor”
• applying Cohen and holding § 523(a)(2)(A) applies even when “no portion of a creditor’s claim was literally transferred to the fraudulent debtor”
• debtor misrepresented his status as an architect to homeowners
• interpreting Cohen, 523 U.S. 213
• interpreting Cohen, 523 U.S. 213
• interpreting Cohen, 523 U.S. 213

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).