In Re Richard C. Beaver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he public responsibility of the Patent and Trademark Office requires attentive performance of all aspects of the patent examination function”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Norman K. Alton, Mary A. Peters, Yitzhak Tabinsky, and David L. Snitman
  Federal Circuit· 1996-02-05· cited 49×
• The Gillette Company v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1990-11-20· cited 48×
• In Re Lovin
  Federal Circuit· 2011-07-22· cited 16×
• Putman v. Dudas
  District of Columbia· 2008-03-28· cited 3×
• In re Pearce
  Federal Circuit· 2010-03-24

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Howard Sernaker
  Federal Circuit· 1983-02-28· cited 95×
• In Re Jay P. Nielson
  Federal Circuit· 1987-04-21· cited 11×