Skip to main content

In re R.F.

Citations

  • 135 Vt. 275
  • 376 A.2d 38
  • 1977 Vt. LEXIS 607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • family court’s decision in modification proceeding will not be set aside absent showing that court’s discretion was exercised on grounds clearly untenable or to extent clearly unreasonable
  • family court's decision in modification proceeding will not be set aside absent showing that court's discretion was exercised on grounds clearly untenable or to extent clearly unreasonable
  • father who failed to appeal a disposition order granting custody to SRS and who sought modification of the order was not entitled to custody as a matter of law even though he was not shown to be an unfit parent; rather he was required to meet the standard for modification
  • father who failed to appeal a disposition order granting custody to SRS and who sought modification of the order was not entitled to custody as a matter of law even though he was not shown to be an unfit parent; rather he was required to meet the standard for modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, Billings, Daley, Hill, Larrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.