In re Revocation of Restaurant Liquor License No. R-2282 & Amusement Permit No. AP-2282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a second offense was “subsequent,” for purposes of HRS § 712-1200(4
• holding that a second offense was “subsequent,” for purposes of HRS § 712-1200(4), inasmuch as it was “ ‘subsequent,’ in terms of both commission and ascertainment of guilt,” notwithstanding that the two convictions had occurred simultaneously in the course of the same proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).