· 3/18/2021
IN RE RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC-RESUMPTION OF DEADLINES FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS
Citations
- 2021 Ark. 67
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that there was no evidence that the store or its employees caused customer’s fall or had actual or constructive knowledge of the hazard
- “The plaintiff must present specific proof as to the relevant actual length of time.”
- “[T]he court will not indulge presumptions for the deficiencies in plaintiff’s evidence as to the length of time the hazard existed . . . . The plaintiff must present specific proof as to the relevant actual length of time.” (citation modified)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.