Skip to main content
· 3/18/2021

IN RE RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC-RESUMPTION OF DEADLINES FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS

Citations

  • 2021 Ark. 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that there was no evidence that the store or its employees caused customer’s fall or had actual or constructive knowledge of the hazard
  • “The plaintiff must present specific proof as to the relevant actual length of time.”
  • “[T]he court will not indulge presumptions for the deficiencies in plaintiff’s evidence as to the length of time the hazard existed . . . . The plaintiff must present specific proof as to the relevant actual length of time.” (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.