In re Request for Reimbursement ex rel. Plevyak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant knew the maximum possible sentences for his state convictions were for over a year in prison because he had signed a plea agreement stating his five-year sentence (most of which was ultimately suspended) and the maximum penalties
• analyzing Double Jeopardy Clause implication on error that arose because of intervening Supreme Court decision in Rehaif v. United States, 588 U.S. 225 (2019)
• “[W]e give full play to the right of the jury to determine credibility, weigh the evidence and draw justifiable inferences of fact.”
• defendant \cannot make out a sufficiency challenge as to offense elements that the government had no requirement to prove at trial under then-prevailing law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).