In Re Report & Recommendation of June 5, 1972 Grand Jury Concerning Transmission of Evidence to the House of Representatives

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the relevant standard “might well justify even a public disclosure” but that there is “certainly ample basis for disclosure to a body” that “has taken elaborate precautions to insure against unnecessary and inappropriate disclosure of these materials”
• stating that House “acts simply as [a] grand jury.”
• “[HJC] has taken elaborate precautions to insure against unnecessary and inappropriate disclosure of these [grand jury] materials. . . . We have no basis on which to assume that [HJC]’s use of the Report will be injudicious . . . .”
• applying the predecessor to the “particularized need” standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).