Skip to main content
· 6/18/2007

In Re Rembrandt Technologies, Lp, Patent Lit.

Citations

  • 493 F. Supp. 2d 1367
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45539
  • 2007 WL 1806045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ordering consolidation over defendant’s objection that “unique questions of fact relating to each patent will predominate over common factual questions”
  • centralizing cases involving \allegations that compliance with one of two technical standards relating to cable high-speed internet technology and digital broadcasting\ infringes certain patents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hodges, Jensen, Motz, Miller, Hansen, Scirica

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.