Second Circuit· 3/8/2000

In Re Reilly

Citations

245 B.R. 768
2000 WL 282350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“ ‘To be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike [us] as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must ... strike [us] as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish.’”
“A de novo review allows us to decide the issue as if no decision had been previously rendered . . .. No deference is given to the Bankruptcy Court’s decision.”
“A de novo review allows us to decide the issue as if no decision had been previously rendered . . .. No deference is given to the Bankruptcy Court’s decision.”
“A de novo review allows us to decide the issue as if no decision had been previously rendered . . . . No deference is given to the Bankruptcy Court’s decision.”
“A de novo review allows us to decide the issue as if no decision had been previously rendered . . . . No deference is given to the Bankruptcy Court’s decision.”
“A de novo review allows us to decide the issue as if no decision had been previously rendered . . . . No deference is given to the Bankruptcy Court’s decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hon. John C. Ninfo, II, Hon. Jeffry H. Gallet & Hon. Robert E. Littlefield, Jr., Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re Reilly

28 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.