· 3/28/2001
In Re Registrant J.M.
Citations
- 772 A.2d 349
- 167 N.J. 490
- 2001 N.J. LEXIS 325
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing development of RRAS as satisfying legislative delegation to Attorney General to devise assessment tool for use in predicting risk of re-offense
- reviewing development of RRAS as satisfying legislative delegation to Attorney General to devise assessment tool for use in predicting risk of re-offense
- rejecting challenge to weighting of static factors more heavily than dynamic factors in RRAS under Megan’s Law
- Megan's Law case emphasizing that the focus on prior offenses in the Registrant Risk Assessment Scale (RRAS) is not due to any attempt at punishment but rather was an attempt to better protect society from those likely to reoffend
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: LaVECCHIA
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.