Skip to main content
· 3/28/2001

In Re Registrant J.M.

Citations

  • 772 A.2d 349
  • 167 N.J. 490
  • 2001 N.J. LEXIS 325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing development of RRAS as satisfying legislative delegation to Attorney General to devise assessment tool for use in predicting risk of re-offense
  • reviewing development of RRAS as satisfying legislative delegation to Attorney General to devise assessment tool for use in predicting risk of re-offense
  • rejecting challenge to weighting of static factors more heavily than dynamic factors in RRAS under Megan’s Law
  • Megan's Law case emphasizing that the focus on prior offenses in the Registrant Risk Assessment Scale (RRAS) is not due to any attempt at punishment but rather was an attempt to better protect society from those likely to reoffend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: LaVECCHIA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.