In re Reger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the FAR is silent on how to conduct a price realism analysis”
• rejecting protestor’s argument to the extent it involved a challenge to the solicitation’s terms after receipt of proposals
• rejecting protestor’s argument to the extent it involved a challenge to the solicitation’s terms after receipt of proposals
• rejecting contention of non-bidding protestor to the extent it was challenging the terms of the solicitation, which must be raised during proposal period
• finding that to the extent that the protestor was challenging the solicitation’s comparison of “Fixed Labor Rate task orders instead of hourly labor rates,” the challenge was untimely and should have been raised “prior to the closing date for receipt of proposals”
• “The Federal Circuit established that challenges to the terms of a solicitation must be raised prior to the closing date for receipt of proposals.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).