Indiana Supreme Court· 9/24/1999
In Re Reed
Citations
- 716 N.E.2d 426
- 1999 Ind. LEXIS 806
- 1999 WL 744163
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding attorney violated Rule 8.2 by stating, inter alia, that the judge “was ignorant, that she was being improperly influenced by politicians, [and] that she had fabricated a report about liquor being present in court offices”
- concluding attorney violated Rule 8.2 by stating, inter alia, that the judge “was ignorant, that she was being improperly influenced by politicians, [and] that she had fabricated a report about liquor being present in court offices”
- prosecutor's statements to press that newly appointed judge was ignorant, was being improperly influenced by politicians, had fabricated a report about liquor being present in court offices, and had no understanding of the cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Selby, Boehm, Shepard, Dickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Consolidated Matter of ChristoffIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-30· cited 22×
- Matter of DarlingIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-21· cited 20×
- Matter of AtangaIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 18×
- Matter of ConwayIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-15· cited 15×
- In the Matter of FriedlandIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-02-10· cited 13×
- Matter of BeckerIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-09-14· cited 12×
- Matter of GarringerIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-01-10· cited 11×
- Matter of TurnerIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-03-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.