In Re Redmond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that payoff statements did not violate automatic stay because “[t]he bank did not seek payment by issuing the letters; rather, it issued them in response to [plaintiff’s] demand” and they were “simply statements of the bank’s position as to what was owed”
• rejecting notion that all payoff letters, even accurate ones, sent in response to debtor’s request would violate the automatic stay as “a position completely without support in either precedent or bankruptcy policy”
• payoff letters sent by mortgage creditor at debtor’s request did not violate the stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Redmond v. Fifth Third Bank
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-10-20· cited 41×
• In Re Weitzman
  N.D. Illinois· 2008-02-07· cited 10×
• Sciortino v. Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources (In re Sciortino)
  N.D. Georgia· 2016-09-20· cited 6×
• Richards v. Stevens
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-02-11· cited 1×
• Redmond, James A. v. Fifth Third Bank
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-10-20

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Johnson v. Home State Bank
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 1,263×
• Nobelman v. American Savings Bank
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
• In Re Aida Lucilla Rosinski D/B/A New Caravan Garden Bar, Debtor. Aida Rosinski D/B/A New Caravan Garden Bar v. Willard Boyd
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-04-12· cited 202×
• Pettibone Corporation v. Carl Easley
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-06-13· cited 171×
• In the Matter of Henri J. Bianucci and Barbara J. Bianucci, Debtors-Appellants
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-10-27· cited 80×
• Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Case (In re Case)
  Fifth Circuit· 1991-08-09· cited 61×
• Koehler v. Grant
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-10-31· cited 42×
• In Re: Shelly Elias, Debtor. Shelly Elias v. U.S. Trustee, Las Vegas, and Lisowski Law Firm, Ltd.
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-30· cited 32×
• Arleaux v. Arleaux
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-07-16· cited 30×
• Virginia v. Collins (In re Collins)
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-04-05· cited 30×
• In Re Carberry
  E.D. Virginia· 1995-06-29· cited 29×
• Helms v. Arboleda (In Re Arboleda)
  N.D. Illinois· 1998-08-27· cited 24×
• In Re Antonious
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-08-07· cited 24×
• Crocker v. Crocker
  First Circuit· 2007-01-16· cited 20×
• In Re Hepburn
  E.D. New York· 1983-02-09· cited 19×
• In Re Sullivan
  N.D. New York· 2007-04-02· cited 15×
• In the Matter Of: Mary Anne Zurn, Debtor-Appellant. Aldo E. Botti, Creditors-Appellees
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-05-15· cited 14×
• In Re Nylon Net Co.
  W.D. Tennessee· 1998-10-08· cited 13×
• In Re Tinsley
  S.D. Ohio· 1989-03-20· cited 9×
• In Re Padilla
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-03-26· cited 8×