In Re Rebekah Killion v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that association of investment companies had standing to challenge regulation authorizing banks to operate collective investment funds
• holding that association of investment companies had standing to challenge regulation authorizing banks to operate collective invest-merit funds
• finding that association of investment companies had standing to challenge federal regulation which harmed its members
• recognizing that investment companies had standing to challenge a regulation from the Comptroller of the Currency that permitted—but did not require—third-party banks “to establish and operate collective investment 58 Case: 17-11009 Date Filed: 12/13/2019 Page: 59 of 83 funds”
• finding “competitor standing,” on the part of investment companies, to test a regulatory ruling authorizing national banks to operate colléctive investment funds
• granting investment companies standing to challenge ruling that banks could deal in collective investment funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).