In re Rebecca W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s conclusion made on basis of “testimony of [expert witness] and the petitioner, that the continuation of the [respondent’s] parental rights would have a clearly detrimental effect on the future well-being of the child”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Nicolina T.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-02-10· cited 132×
• In Re Davonta V.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-02-12· cited 83×
• In re Jeisean M.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-27· cited 36×
• In re Cynthia A.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-08-26· cited 19×
• In re Teshea D.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-01-20· cited 14×
• In re Angela C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-07-14· cited 5×
• In re Shannon S.
  Connecticut Superior Court· 1988-07-01· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Juvenile Appeal v. Commissioner of Children & Youth Services
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-06-12· cited 277×
• In re Theresa S.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-23· cited 87×
• In re Juvenile Appeal (83-BC)
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-18· cited 57×

Other cases named In re Rebecca W.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• In re Rebecca W.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-07-11· cited 9×