Skip to main content
· 6/25/2020

In Re: Reappointments to the Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts interpret a contract “as a whole, interpreting particular language in the context of other contract provisions”
  • noting that “[t]he primary objective in contract interpretation is to as- certain the mutual intent of the parties at the time they executed the contract”
  • explaining that extrinsic evidence may be used to determine the meaning of specific words or terms in a contract, but not to contradict or modify the contract’s plain language
  • “[C]ontract 5 No. 79236-9-I/6 interpretation is a question of law when the interpretation does not depend on the use of extrinsic evidence.”
  • we view contracts as a whole by interpreting particular language in the context of other provisions
  • “When a contract provides for an attorney fee award in the trial court, the party prevailing before this court may seek reasonable attorney fees incurred on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.