· 9/12/2019
In Re: Reappointment of Jane Smedley Anzalone to Committee on Rules of Evidence
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that statements in offering materials related to ‘high quality” and “premium” products were non-actionable puffery or, in the alterative, nonactionable opinion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.