In Re Reading Tube Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding projections by a member of the debtor’s board of directors were insufficient to meet the burden of proof under section 364(d)
• Debtor relied solely upon its own personal projections to demonstrate the existence of adequate protection
• “The absence of a definition of adequate protection in the Code coupled with the ‘flexibility’ of Section 361(3) suggests that adequate protection may be shown in a variety of ways.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).