Skip to main content
· 8/27/2013

In Re: RCS Capital Development v.

Citations

  • 728 F.3d 301
  • 70 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 455
  • 2013 WL 4516820
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17844
  • 58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that recognition is mandatory when an insolvency proceeding meets the criteria of section 1502
  • finding that chapter 15 directs courts to act in aid of main proceeding and to maximize assistance
  • stating that “the COMI presumption may be overcome particularly in the case of a ‘letterbox’ company not carrying out any business” in the country where its registered office is located
  • stating that “the COMI presumption may be overcome particularly in the case of a ‘letterbox’ company not carrying out any business” in the country where its registered office is located
  • examining Congress’s purpose in enacting chapter 15 and explaining the objectives of the legislation
  • exception “is only intended to be invoked under exceptional circumstances concerning matters of fundamental importance” for the United States (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scirica, Jordan, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.