Third Circuit· 8/27/2013
In Re: RCS Capital Development v.
Citations
- 728 F.3d 301
- 70 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 455
- 2013 WL 4516820
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17844
- 58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 91
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that recognition is mandatory when an insolvency proceeding meets the criteria of section 1502
- finding that chapter 15 directs courts to act in aid of main proceeding and to maximize assistance
- stating that “the COMI presumption may be overcome particularly in the case of a ‘letterbox’ company not carrying out any business” in the country where its registered office is located
- stating that “the COMI presumption may be overcome particularly in the case of a ‘letterbox’ company not carrying out any business” in the country where its registered office is located
- examining Congress’s purpose in enacting chapter 15 and explaining the objectives of the legislation
- exception “is only intended to be invoked under exceptional circumstances concerning matters of fundamental importance” for the United States (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scirica, Jordan, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Trikona Advisers Ltd. v. ChughSecond Circuit· 2017-01-18· cited 104×
- In re Ocean Rig UDW Inc.S.D. New York· 2017-08-24· cited 30×
- In re Ennia Caribe Holding N.V.S.D. New York· 2018-12-20· cited 13×
- in Asi, Inc. v. Liquidators (In re Manley Toys Ltd.)D. New Jersey· 2019-03-12· cited 9×
- Carr v. Arellano (In re Arellano)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-01-06· cited 8×
- Michael Jaffe v. Samsung Electronics CompanyFourth Circuit· 2013-12-03· cited 7×
- Flynn v. Wallace (In re Irish Bank Resolution Corp.)D. Delaware· 2015-08-04· cited 7×
- Alastair Beveridge of Alixpartners Servs. U.K., LLP v. Vidunas (In re O'Reilly)W.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-03-22· cited 4×
- Zhejiang Topoint Photovoltaic Co. v. Zhi Chen (In re Zhejiang Topoint Photovoltaic Co.)D. New Jersey· 2019-04-02· cited 4×
- Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE LtdThird Circuit· 2024-02-01· cited 2×
- In re Nortel Networks, Inc.D. Delaware· 2015-05-12· cited 1×
- In re Irish Bank Resolution Corp.D. Delaware· 2016-11-07· cited 1×
- Trikona Advisers Limited v. ChughSecond Circuit· 2017-01-18
- In re: Black Gold S.A.R.L.Ninth Circuit· 2022-02-17
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 1,643×
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court· 1966-01-18· cited 1,071×
- Begier v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 701×
- In Re Fairfield Sentry Ltd. LitigationS.D. New York· 2011-09-19· cited 72×
- Charles R. Hall Motors, Inc. v. LewisEleventh Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 67×
- In Re Atlas Shipping A/SS.D. New York· 2009-04-27· cited 67×
- RSM Richter Inc. v. Aguilar (In Re Ephedra Products Liability Litigation)S.D. New York· 2006-08-11· cited 59×
- City of Farrell v. Sharon Steel Corp.Third Circuit· 1994-11-15· cited 42×
- In Re Betcorp Ltd.D. Nevada· 2009-02-09· cited 40×
- In Re Condor Ins. Ltd.Fifth Circuit· 2010-03-18· cited 33×
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. Qimonda AG (In Re Qimonda AG Bankruptcy Litigation)E.D. Virginia· 2010-07-02· cited 30×
- In Re Jean R. Deseno, Debtor. Midlantic National Bank v. Jean R. Deseno, Us Trustee, TrusteeThird Circuit· 1994-03-16· cited 29×
- In Re Marlene Moffett, Debtor, Tidewater Finance Company, No. 03-1279. v. Marlene MoffettFourth Circuit· 2004-01-23· cited 28×
- In Re Gold & Honey, Ltd.E.D. New York· 2009-08-21· cited 22×
- Matter of Continental Airlines, Inc.D. Delaware· 1991-12-06· cited 10×
- In re Qimonda AGE.D. Virginia· 2012-11-07· cited 6×
- In re LeeD. Massachusetts· 2012-06-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.