· 8/27/2013
In Re: RCS Capital Development v.
Citations
- 728 F.3d 301
- 70 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 455
- 2013 WL 4516820
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17844
- 58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 91
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that recognition is mandatory when an insolvency proceeding meets the criteria of section 1502
- finding that chapter 15 directs courts to act in aid of main proceeding and to maximize assistance
- stating that “the COMI presumption may be overcome particularly in the case of a ‘letterbox’ company not carrying out any business” in the country where its registered office is located
- stating that “the COMI presumption may be overcome particularly in the case of a ‘letterbox’ company not carrying out any business” in the country where its registered office is located
- examining Congress’s purpose in enacting chapter 15 and explaining the objectives of the legislation
- exception “is only intended to be invoked under exceptional circumstances concerning matters of fundamental importance” for the United States (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scirica, Jordan, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.