In Re Rawls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where Rawls “created a fraudulent receipt, criminally forged a client’s name on it, and submitted it to the Commission, acting as an agency of this Court, with the intent of deceiving the Commission.” Any injury to the Commission appeared to be only “potential.”
• “CLE noncompliance suspension, 10 5/23/06; reinstated 6/21/06.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).