Skip to main content
· 11/27/1985

In Re Rath Packing Co.

Citations

  • 55 B.R. 528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that for tax avoidance, the “purpose 3 must be the principal purpose of the plan, not merely a principal purpose”
  • “Bankruptcy Court is clearly the proper forum for determining whether a debtor’s reorganizing plan has tax avoidance as its principal purpose.”
  • holder of disallowed claim not \creditor\ with standing to object to modification of plan
  • claim listed in “an unknown amount” is unliquidated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peder K. Ecker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.