Skip to main content
· 7/29/1983

In Re Rail King, Inc.

Citations

  • 33 B.R. 4
  • 9 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 448
  • 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 5703
  • 11 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Class Five is deemed to have rejected the plan due to the fact that the shareholders in that class are to receive nothing under the Plan.”
  • where, in a similar situation, the debtor did not intend to submit any disclosure statement but the Court ruled that a class which the debtor intended to “cram-down” still had a right to vote on the Plan and an approved disclosure statement was therefore necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: H.F. White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.