In re Radcliffe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “to prevail on a negligence claim, [Plaintiff] must demonstrate that Defendants breached a duty independent from their obligations under the contract”
• dismissing fraud claim where plaintiff identified the speakers but gave only a general description of the statements that he alleged were fraudulent and failed to identify when and where the statements were made
• dismissing fraudulent inducement claim where allegations “identif[y] the speakers, but give[] only a general description of the statements that [Plaintiff] contends were fraudulent and fail[] altogether to identify ‘where and when the statements were made’” (citation omitted)
• representations made as to prospective employer’s capabilities collateral “insofar as the contract . . . says nothing about such matters”
• representations made as to prospective employer’s capabilities collateral “insofar as the contract . . . says nothing about such matters”
• “{U]nder New York law, an employee cannot recover for an employer’s failure to pay a bonus under a compensation plan that provides the employer with absolute discretion over bonus determinations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).