New York Court of Appeals· 2/20/1980
In re Quinton A.
Citations
- 49 N.Y.2d 328
- 402 N.E.2d 126
- 425 N.Y.S.2d 788
- 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2077
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is a fundamental principle of evidence that, with limited exceptions ... a confession may be considered only against its maker”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matter of Jose R.New York Court of Appeals· 1994-03-29· cited 46×
- the Matter of County of Chemung, St. Lawrence, Chautauqua, Jefferson, Oneida, Genesee, Cayuga, Monroe v. Nirav R. ShahNew York Court of Appeals· 2016-10-27· cited 34×
- Mayfield v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-02-14· cited 18×
- People v. FormanCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1989-09-05· cited 17×
- State v. Strong Oil Co.New York Supreme Court· 1980-10-23· cited 14×
- Restrepo v. StateNew York State Court of Claims· 1989-12-26· cited 14×
- In re Keith H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-02-22· cited 12×
- People v. GrupeCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1988-08-17· cited 11×
- People v. BrownNew York County Courts· 1985-03-20· cited 10×
- People v. StephenCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1992-02-10· cited 10×
- People v. TiffanyCriminal Court of the City of New York· 2001-01-30· cited 10×
- People of N.Y., Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-04-07· cited 9×
- LaDuke v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-06-22· cited 9×
- Henry v. ScullyS.D. New York· 1995-07-14· cited 8×
- People v. MiccioCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1992-10-20· cited 8×
- In re Kai B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-03-27· cited 7×
- Liberto v. Worcester Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-07-06· cited 7×
- Doe v. New York City Department of Social ServicesS.D. New York· 1987-09-24· cited 7×
- In re Jamel F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-11-24· cited 6×
- In re Dewayne B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-12-31· cited 6×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 3,743×
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,147×
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court· 1978-05-01· cited 1,419×
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 1,231×
- Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 590×
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1978-12-11· cited 468×
- Van Berkel v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals· 1965-07-09· cited 160×
- Jones v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals· 1978-07-13· cited 99×
- Vega v. BellNew York Court of Appeals· 1979-07-09· cited 67×
- People ex rel. Wayburn v. SchupfNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-05-13· cited 59×
- In re Gregory W.New York Court of Appeals· 1966-12-30· cited 57×
- MATTER OF TAYLOR v. SiseNew York Court of Appeals· 1974-02-12· cited 56×
- People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals· 1974-07-10· cited 56×
- People v. SafianNew York Court of Appeals· 1978-12-06· cited 49×
- People v. McNeilNew York Court of Appeals· 1969-04-23· cited 46×
- In re Samuel W.New York Court of Appeals· 1969-03-06· cited 27×
Other cases named In re Quinton A.
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.