In re Quina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when “attempting to forecast state law” under Erie, federal courts “must consider,” inter alia, “analogous decisions.”
• holding that under Pennsylvania’s ‘borrowing statute,’ the federal court had to use Ohio equitable tolling cases to determine whether a diversity cause of action arising in Ohio 30 should be tolled under Ohio’s statute of limitations
• “In our view, the essential question posed under the ‘borrowing statute’ is whether the action in question is precluded by the laws of the state in which it accrued, and the answer to that question also must be based on the law of the state in which the claim arose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).