In re Quest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that claimant’s history of performing demanding work over long hours “justifies the inference that when he stopped working he did so for the reasons he testified to”
• stating that the claimant’s “history of hard labor performed under demanding conditions over long hours . . . justifie[d] the inference that when he stopped working he did so for the reasons testified to”
• claimant’s history of performing demanding work over long hours “justifies the inference that when he stopped working he did so for the reasons he testified to”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).