Skip to main content
· 11/29/1995

In Re Quaker Distributors, Inc.

Citations

  • 189 B.R. 63
  • 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 369
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1703
  • 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 287
  • 1995 WL 707900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the bankruptcy court’s expressly-stated intention to review fee applications in its dismissal order simply constitutes the law of the case, not a prerequisite to jurisdiction
  • noting that “overreaching counsel could frustrate the requisite court review by the simple medium of encouraging the debtor to seek dismissal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David A. Scholl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.