Skip to main content
· 6/8/1982

In Re Pyramid Co. of Burlington

Citations

  • 449 A.2d 915
  • 141 Vt. 294
  • 1982 Vt. LEXIS 543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[p]iecemeal appellate review causes unnecessary delay and expense, and wastes scarce judicial resources”
  • noting that the failure to satisfy any V.R.A.P. 5(b) criteria precludes the certification of an interlocutory appeal
  • noting that “the core purpose of interlocutory appeal is to avoid unnecessary proceedings in the trial courts.” (quotation omitted)
  • dismissing interlocutory appeal and indicating matter would return to civil division for further proceedings
  • declining to address interlocutory appeal when issues are not ripe for review
  • interlocutory appeals are an exception to the finality rule, which is meant to discourage piecemeal appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Daley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.