· 6/8/1982
In Re Pyramid Co. of Burlington
Citations
- 449 A.2d 915
- 141 Vt. 294
- 1982 Vt. LEXIS 543
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[p]iecemeal appellate review causes unnecessary delay and expense, and wastes scarce judicial resources”
- noting that the failure to satisfy any V.R.A.P. 5(b) criteria precludes the certification of an interlocutory appeal
- noting that “the core purpose of interlocutory appeal is to avoid unnecessary proceedings in the trial courts.” (quotation omitted)
- dismissing interlocutory appeal and indicating matter would return to civil division for further proceedings
- declining to address interlocutory appeal when issues are not ripe for review
- interlocutory appeals are an exception to the finality rule, which is meant to discourage piecemeal appellate review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Daley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.