Skip to main content
· 4/1/1926

In re Public Opinion Pub. Co.

Citations

  • 20 F.2d 404
  • 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “there is an inference from the existence of a blank for the name of defendant’s lawyer and from the absence of any evidence to the contrary that defendant was not represented by counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Runyon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.