· 4/1/1926
In re Public Opinion Pub. Co.
Citations
- 20 F.2d 404
- 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1774
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “there is an inference from the existence of a blank for the name of defendant’s lawyer and from the absence of any evidence to the contrary that defendant was not represented by counsel”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Runyon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.