Skip to main content
· 5/19/1999

In Re P.R.T.C., Inc., Debtor. Duckor Spradling & Metzger v. Baum Trust

Citations

  • 177 F.3d 774
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3665
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 4734
  • 42 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 269
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9504
  • 34 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a creditor had standing to appeal a bankruptcy court order that left the estates from which the creditor could recover “without any other significant asset”
  • noting that, to be “final,” a bankruptcy order must “finally determine!] ] the discrete issue to which it is addressed” and “resolve[ ] and seriously affect[ ] substantive rights”
  • allowing the sale where the estate did not have the funds to pursue the avoidance claims, but believed they may be valuable
  • allowing the sale where the estate did not have the funds to pursue the avoidance claims, but believed they may be valuable
  • approving derivative standing for agreement between trustee and creditor where estate received 50% of proceeds of avoidance action
  • “Ordinarily, a debtor cannot challenge a bankruptcy court’s order unless there is likely to be a surplus after bankruptcy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Wiggins, Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.