In re Proteau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the fact finder was entitled to rely on circumstantial evidence that the defendant removed the tags from stolen clothes before taking them from a store
• defendant put several jeans on under his own clothes and, although he had not yet left the store, he was guilty of theft because he intended to deprive the store of the items
• defendant put several pairs of jeans on under his own clothes, and although he had not yet left the store, he was guilty of theft because he intended to deprive the store of the items
• involving theft by taking which occurred in a department store

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).