Skip to main content

In Re Proportionality Review Project

Citations

  • 735 A.2d 528
  • 161 N.J. 71
  • 1999 N.J. LEXIS 999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recommending that Special Master reconsider creating hierarchy of salient-factors categories according to replacement method, rather than unique assignment
  • noting that “proportionality review [does] not occur if the defendant’s direct appeal [is] successful.” (quoting State v. Loftin, 157 N.J. 253, 316, 724 A.2d 129 (1999))
  • noting that \proportionality review [does] not occur if the defendant's direct appeal [is] successful.\ (quoting State v. Loftin, 157 N.J. 253, 316, 724 A. 2d 129 (1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Handler, O'Hern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.