In Re Property Seized for Forfeiture From Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• detailing that on further review the court can examine all issues raised or limit consideration to a particular issue
• discussing the ways in which an in rem proceeding might be brought, one of which does not require a ninety-day notice
• noting “our mandate to construe statutes in a fashion to avoid a constitutional infirmity where possible” but adding that this principle does not apply when “[t]he language is not ambiguous”
• “[W]e cannot avoid the constitutional issue posed by the [statute’s] plain language . . . .”
• \[W]e cannot avoid the constitutional issue posed by the [statute's] plain language ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).