In Re Prison Litigation Reform Act

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that non-prisoners proceeding in forma pauperis are subject to the screening requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)
• holding that prisoners must pay the filing fees even if granted pauper status, as they “are no longer entitled to a waiver of fees and costs.”
• concluding that plaintiffs proceeding together should be charged a single fee, apportioned among them
• concluding that plaintiffs should be charged a single fee, apportioned among them
• concluding that plaintiffs should be charged a single fee, apportioned among them
• stating that district court should dismiss for want of prosecution if a prisoner does not file the trust fund account statement or pay the filing fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).