Skip to main content
· 12/13/2000

In Re Prides

Citations

  • 235 F.3d 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Court found that Cendant would not be harmed because the original limits of Cendant’s financial obligation had not been expanded.”
  • excusing a three week delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.