Skip to main content
· 3/6/1989

In Re Prantil

Citations

  • 768 P.2d 109
  • 48 Cal. 3d 227
  • 255 Cal. Rptr. 890
  • 1989 Cal. LEXIS 379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the due process afforded the attorney at his criminal proceeding resolved the \`entire matter'\ and rejecting his claim that use of his conviction at a disciplinary proceeding violated due process (quoting In re Disbarment of Collins, 188 Cal. 701, 708, 206 P. 990 (1922))
  • stating that the due process afforded the attorney at his criminal proceeding resolved the \`entire matter'\ and rejecting his claim that use of his conviction at a disciplinary proceeding violated due process (quoting In re Disbarment of Collins, 188 Cal. 701, 708, 206 P. 990 (1922))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.