In re Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘Under the moral hazard argument, both a rational insurer and strong public policy would not provide coverage for the intentional discharge of pollution.”
• “Ultramar cannot reasonably] maintain that, in 1983, knowledge of extensive groundwater contamination of a site they were proposing to acquire would not result in liability for cleaning it up.”
• “The architecture of the policies strongly suggests that the ‘package’ of covered risks was embodied in part two, and that, to continue the metaphor, part one was merely the string that tied the bundle together.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).