In Re Poynor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[t]his distinction between ownership rights and beneficiary rights appears to be more consistent with the intent of the Bankruptcy Code\
• “[t]his distinction between ownership rights and beneficiary rights appears to be more consistent with the intent of the Bankruptcy Code”
• “Even exempt property must initially be regarded as property of the estate and then claimed and distributed as exempt”
• \[t]o allow the debtor/beneficiary to exempt life insurance proceeds greater than the extent 'reasonably necessary for support' would provide the debtor with a windfall.... [T]he intent of the Bankruptcy Code appears to require such excess to be available to the creditors\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).