In Re Posadas Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sections 503(b)(3)(E) and 503(b)(4) also grant administrative status to the “winding up” costs and expenses allowable under section 543(c)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Szwak v. Earwood (In Re Bodenheimer, Jones, Szwak, & Winchell L.L.P.)
  Fifth Circuit· 2009-12-29· cited 24×
• In Re 245 Associates, LLC
  S.D. New York· 1995-11-09· cited 21×
• In Re Uno Broadcasting Corp.
  D. Arizona· 1994-05-11· cited 13×
• In Re 400 Madison Avenue Ltd. Partnership
  S.D. New York· 1997-10-14· cited 10×
• Matter of Rimsat, Ltd.
  N.D. Indiana· 1996-01-24· cited 10×
• Yellow Cab Cooperative Ass'n v. Mathis (In Re Yellow Cab Cooperative Ass'n)
  D. Colorado· 1995-09-01· cited 5×
• In re 29 Brooklyn Avenue, LLC
  E.D. New York· 2016-04-27· cited 5×
• Szwak v. Earwood
  Fifth Circuit· 2009-12-29· cited 3×
• In re R. Brown & Sons, Inc.
  D. Vermont· 2013-09-18· cited 2×
• In Re Lcl Income Properties, Lp Vi
  S.D. Ohio· 1995-01-30· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Washington Lane Associates
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-10-30· cited 16×
• In Re Gomes
  D. Rhode Island· 1982-04-02· cited 11×
• Matter of North Port Development Co.
  E.D. Missouri· 1983-11-10· cited 8×
• Matter of Left Guard of Madison, Inc.
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1981-05-08· cited 8×
• In Re Marichal-Agosto, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1981-07-28· cited 7×
• In Re Gherman
  S.D. Florida· 1989-08-22· cited 4×