Skip to main content
· 6/19/1991

In re Porrazzo

Citations

  • 771 F. Supp. 304
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12209
  • 1991 WL 166726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that any claim based on a breach of the venture agreement was “plainly subject to the forum-selection clause” as such claims arose from the basis of the contract
  • concluding that any claim based on a breach of the venture agreement was “plainly subject to the forum-selection clause” as such claims arose from the basis of the contract
  • finding where party resisting enforcement of forum selection clause relied on contract relationship to bring claims, those claims arise “in connection with” contract
  • “[S]ummary judgment on an account stated claim is inappropriate where the evidence shows that there was a dispute about the account or the quality of the work performed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.