District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 12/15/2005
In Re Ponds
Citations
- 888 A.2d 234
- 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 642
- 2005 WL 3434373
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying District law where the respondent was charged with violating the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct
- applying District law in a case where the respondent was charged with violating the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct
- District of Columbia disciplinary proceeding applying the Maryland professional rules of conduct where the attorney’s misconduct occurred in a Maryland case
- District of Columbia disciplinary proceeding applying the Maryland professional rules of conduct where the attorney’s misconduct occurred in a Maryland federal case that had concluded
- District of Columbia disciplinary proceeding applying the Maryland professional rules of conduct where the attorney’s misconduct occurred in a Maryland case
- District of Columbia disciplinary proceeding applying the Maryland professional rules of conduct where the attorney’s misconduct occurred in a Maryland federal case that had concluded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry, Ruiz, King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.