Skip to main content

Citations

  • 206 A.D.2d 254
  • 614 N.Y.S.2d 405
  • 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in FLSA cases, district courts must also review unilateral notices of dismissal by a plaintiff pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)
  • holding that, in FLSA cases, district courts must also review unilateral notices of dismissal by a plaintiff pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)
  • holding that, in FLSA cases, district courts must also review unilateral notices of dismissal by a plaintiff pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)
  • holding that, in FLSA cases, district courts must also review unilateral notices of dismissal by a plaintiff pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)
  • holding that “the logic of Cheeks . . . applies equally to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) dismissals without prejudice”
  • holding that, in FLSA cases, district courts must also review unilateral notices of dismissal by a plaintiff pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.