Skip to main content
· 9/23/1925

In re Plants

Citations

  • 7 F.2d 507
  • 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that if the amount in controversy is challenged, then the party invoking federal jurisdiction must prove by a preponderance of evidence that it is entitled to recover amount required by § 1332 or face dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neterer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.