Washington Supreme Court· 12/29/2011
In Re Pierce
Citations
- 268 P.3d 907
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “costs of incarceration” imposed by RCW 9.94A.760(2) fall within the broad definition of “legal financial obligation”
- “[I]f an inmate can show that the Department lacks authority to deduct funds from [their] account, [they] would meet [their] burden of proving unlawful restraint under RAP 16.4.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stephens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,615×
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,608×
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court· 2003-05-22· cited 558×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-10· cited 352×
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court· 1999-05-27· cited 248×
- Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court· 2007-12-06· cited 223×
- In re the Personal Restraint of GranthamWashington Supreme Court· 2010-02-04· cited 99×
- In Re GranthamWashington Supreme Court· 2010-02-04· cited 97×
- In re the Personal Restraint of SappenfieldWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 20×
- In Re GentryWashington Supreme Court· 2010-12-30· cited 17×
- In re the Personal Restraint of GentryWashington Supreme Court· 2010-12-30· cited 17×
- In Re MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-22· cited 7×
- In re the Personal Restraint of MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.