In Re Phoenix Business Park Ltd. Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that not all default rates are “penalty rates”
• holding that not all default rates are “penalty rates”
• holding that not all default rates are “penalty rates”
• holding that not all default rates are “penalty rates”
• “[T]he incorporation of new section 365(b)(2)(D), as interpreted by the Ninth Circuit, into section 1124(2)(A) squarely suggests a congressional intent directly contrary to the Trust's interpretation of section 1123(d), a section added at exactly the same time.”
• “[T]he incorporation of new section 365(b)(2)(D), as interpreted by the Ninth Circuit, into section 1124(2)(A) squarely suggests a congressional intent directly contrary to the Trust's interpretation of section 1123(d), a section added at exactly the same time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).